However, if the Applicant considers this to be appropriate (and more cost-effective) it can be presented in this way. Please note, this advice note refers to annexes in a separate document (DOC 132 KB). Find more similar flip PDFs like March 2015 - Tidal Lagoon Cardiff EIA Scoping Report. 3.4 Applicants should be aware that a screening opinion from the Planning Inspectorate confirming that a Proposed Development is not an EIA development (a negative opinion) does not negate the need for the submission of environmental information stipulated in other legislation, including for example a flood risk assessment and information on the historic environment which is required in all cases (see Regulation 5(2) of the Infrastructure Planning (Applications: Prescribed Forms and Procedures) Regulations 2009 (as amended) (the APFP Regulations)). This Advice Note explains the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) process set out in the Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017 (the EIA Regulations). a description of the Proposed Development, including its location and technical capacity; an explanation of the likely significant effects of the development on the environment; and. Each item of advice and guidance sets out the general type of casework and/ or the legislation that is applicable to it, and should be read and applied in that way. The Planning Inspectorate refers to aspects as meaning the relevant descriptions of the environment identified in accordance with the EIA Regulations. there must not be any other files within the *.zip file; it should be in the British National Grid (OSGB1936) format; multiple *.zip files or multiple .shp files within a single zip file are not compatible with the Planning Inspectorates GIS system. It seeks to provide advice about the format and content of the Consultation Report. You can find more information on our privacy page. Is there sufficient confidence in the avoidance or mitigation method in terms of deliverability and efficacy to support the request? This advice note provides advice for Applicants in relation to the Habitats Regulations. Advice Note One: Local Impact Reports Republished April 2012 (version 2). Planning and development This advice note has been revised in response to emerging best practice and to clarify the duties on the Secretary of State and the role of the European Economic Area Member States and the Planning Inspectorate in the process. Formatting changes were also applied. 9.2 The requirements of Schedule 4 of the EIA Regulations 2017 will be considered carefully by the Planning Inspectorate at the point of a DCO application to ensure that any accompanying ES is adequate and complies with the EIA Regulations. Press office. 7. The Inspectorate has also developed long and short form proformas for the consideration of transboundary impacts reflecting that not all NSIPs pose the same risk of transboundary impacts. ask the Secretary of State to adopt a screening opinion in respect of the development to which the application relates (Regulation 8(1)(a)); or, notify the Secretary of State in writing that they propose to provide an ES in respect of that development (Regulation 8(1)(b)). This advice note should be read in conjunction with the supporting annexes found below: Advice Note Twelve: Transboundary Impacts and Process Republished December 2020 (version 6). However, because the information is already published and accessible to you, it is exempt under Section 21 of FOIA. Applicants should be aware of the requirements, in certain circumstances to notify Regulation 11(1)(c) bodies. Summary of this Advice Note 5.10 Ensuring that ESs are appropriately focused on aspects and matters where a likely significant effect may occur is essential. the steps that are required to be undertaken by the Secretary of State under Regulation 21 or by the relevant authority under Regulation 25, as appropriate. Check Pages 1-50 of March 2015 - Tidal Lagoon Cardiff EIA Scoping Report in the flip PDF version. Advice notes which deal with the PA2008 process are non-statutory. 5.13 Applicants should note that aspects/matters are not scoped out unless specifically confirmed as being scoped out by the scoping opinion. 10.3 The Planning Inspectorate takes its data protection responsibilities for the information you provide us with very seriously. 6.6 Detailed information on the submission of application documents, including the ES, is provided in Advice Note 6. it should be a polygon geometry type and consist of one or more polygon features representing the proposed DCO site boundary (including any temporary, permanent and associated development); it should be a single, valid, ESRI Shapefile for the proposed DCO site boundary, provided as a *.zip file using the default WinZip settings (ie no encryption, normal compression etc. Although in many cases they include recommendations from the Planning Inspectorate about the approach to particular matters of process, which applicants and others are encouraged to consider carefully, it is not a requirement for applicants or others to have regard to the content of advice notes. 5.2 The request made under Regulation 10(1) must include: 5.3 More detailed information regarding the information to be included in the scoping request is set out at Insert 2. This would facilitate the Secretary of States consideration under Regulation 32 of the EIA Regulations. This advice note addresses the use of the Rochdale Envelope approach under the Planning Act 2008 (PA2008). We also publish good practice advice notes and other guidance relating to planning appeals and other casework under the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 and related legislation. However, if this cannot be avoided and options remain under consideration (for example a number of route corridors associated with a proposed linear development), Applicants should be aware that this may affect the ability of the Planning Inspectorate and consultation bodies to provide detailed comments. an explanation of the approach to addressing uncertainty where it remains in relation to elements of the Proposed Development eg design parameters; referenced plans presented at an appropriate scale to convey clearly the information and all known features associated with the Proposed Development; an outline of the reasonable alternatives considered and the reasons for selecting the preferred option; a summary table depicting each of the aspects and matters that are requested to be scoped out allowing for quick identification of issues; a detailed description of the aspects and matters proposed to be scoped out of further assessment with justification provided; results of desktop and baseline studies where available and where relevant to the decision to scope in or out aspects or matters; aspects and matters to be scoped in, the report should include details of the methods to be used to assess impacts and to determine significance of effect eg criteria for determining sensitivity and magnitude; any avoidance or mitigation measures proposed, how they may be secured and the anticipated residual effects; references to any guidance and best practice to be relied upon; evidence of agreements reached with consultation bodies (for example the statutory nature conservation bodies or local authorities); and. Advice Note Eleven: Working with public bodies in the infrastructure planning process Republished November 2017 (version 4). the proposed draft DCO site boundary (identified by a red line) including any associated development; any permanent land take required for the Proposed Development; any temporary land take required for construction, including construction compounds; any existing infrastructure which would be retained or upgraded for use as part of the Proposed Development and any existing infrastructure which would be removed; and. 2.1The Inspectorate understands that measures required in response to COVID-19 had consequences for Applicants ability to obtain relevant environmental information for the purposes of their assessment. Update to annex to reflect the limit of file size that can be sent by email. Amongst the requirements is a reference to the inclusion of additional information specified in Schedule 4 where relevant to the specific characteristics of the particular development or type of development and to the environmental features likely to be significantly affected (Regulation 14(2)(f ) of the EIA Regulations 2017). The Inspectorate is required to take into account the advice it receives from the statutory consultation bodies and will continue to do so in this regard. Site content: Copyright 2012 The Planning Inspectorate, Daventry International Rail Freight Terminal, Daventry International Rail Freight Terminal Expansion, East Midlands Gateway Rail Freight Interchange, East Northants Resource Management Facility, East Northants Resource Management Facility Western Extension, Hinckley National Rail Freight Interchange, Northampton Gateway Rail Freight Interchange, Outer Dowsing Offshore Wind (Generating Station), A14 Cambridge to Huntingdon Improvement Scheme, A428 Black Cat to Caxton Gibbet Road Improvement scheme, Cambridge Waste Water Treatment Plant Relocation, East Anglia Green Energy Enablement (GREEN) Project, East West Rail Bedford to Cambridge and Western improvements, Larkshall Mill Aggregate Manufacturing and Carbon Capture Facility, Medworth Energy from Waste Combined Heat and Power Facility, Palm Paper 3 CCGT Power station Kings Lynn, Rookery South Energy from Waste Generating Station, Sheringham and Dudgeon Extension Projects, Woodside Link Houghton Regis Bedfordshire, Expansion of Heathrow Airport (Third Runway), North London (Electricity Line) Reinforcement, A1 Birtley to Coal House Improvement Scheme, A1 in Northumberland Morpeth to Ellingham, A19/A1058 Coast Road Junction Improvement, Boston Alternative Energy Facility (BAEF), International Advanced Manufacturing Park TWO (IAMP TWO), A57 Link Roads (previously known as Trans Pennine Upgrade Programme), A585 Windy Harbour to Skippool Improvement Scheme, Morecambe Offshore Windfarm Generation Assets, Morgan and Morecambe Offshore Wind Farms Transmission Assets, Morgan Offshore Wind Farm Generation Assets, Preesall Saltfield Underground Gas Storage, Hampshire Water Transfer and Water Recycling Project, M25 junction 10/A3 Wisley interchange improvement, Oxfordshire Strategic Rail Freight Interchange, Perrys Farm Hazardous Waste Management Facility, Wheelabrator Kemsley Generating Station (K3) and Wheelabrator Kemsley North (WKN) Waste to Energy Facility, A30 Temple to Higher Carblake Improvement, Bere Alston to Tavistock Railway Reinstatement and Associated Trails, Hinkley Point C New Nuclear Power Station, Hinkley Point C New Nuclear Power Station Material Change 1, Portishead Branch Line MetroWest Phase 1, Internal Power Generation Enhancement for Port Talbot Steelworks, Mid Wales Electricity Connection (N Grid), SP Mid Wales (Electricity) Connections Project (SP Manweb), Reinforcement to North Shropshire Electricity Distribution Network, Stafford Area Improvements Norton Bridge Railway, A160 A180 Port of Immingham Improvement, Able Marine Energy Park Material Change 1, Able Marine Energy Park Material Change 2, Continental Link Multi-Purpose Interconnector, Dogger Bank Teesside A / Sofia Offshore Wind Farm (formerly Dogger Bank Teesside B) Project previously known as Dogger Bank Teesside A&B, Drax Bioenergy with Carbon Capture and Storage Project, Ferrybridge D Combined Cycle Gas Turbine (CCGT) Power Station Project, Ferrybridge Multifuel 2 (FM2) Power Station, Hornsea Offshore Wind Farm (Zone 4) Project One, Hornsea Offshore Wind Farm (Zone 4) Project Two, North Doncaster Rail Chord (near Shaftholme), River Humber Gas Pipeline Replacement Project, White Rose Carbon Capture and Storage Project, Yorkshire and Humber CCS Cross Country Pipeline, Submitting an application for development consent, About the National Infrastructure Planning website, Cookies on the National Infrastructure site, Appendix 1 Preparing the technical index to accompany an NSIP application, Appendix 2 Electronic Application Index, Appendix 3 Section 55 Acceptance of Applications Checklist, Advice Note 8.1: Responding to the developers pre-application consultation, Advice Note 8.2: How to register to participate in an Examination, Advice Note 8.3: Influencing how an application is Examined: the Preliminary Meeting, Advice Note 8.5: The Examination: hearings and site inspections, Advice Note 8.6: Virtual examination events, Annex A Cyfoeth Naturiol Cymru/Natural Resources Wales, Annex G The Health and Safety Executive, Annex H Evidence Plans for Habitats Regulations Assessments of Nationally Significant Infrastructure Projects, Annex 1 the Inspectorates long form transboundary screening proforma, Annex 2 the Inspectorates short form transboundary screening proforma, Advice Note two: The role of local authorities in the development consent process, Advice Note Three: EIA Notification and Consultation, Advice Note Four: Section 52: Obtaining information about interests in land (Planning Act 2008), Advice note Five: Section 53 Rights of Entry (Planning Act 2008), Advice Note Six: Preparation and submission of application documents, Advice Note Six, Appendix One Preparing the application index to accompany an NSIP application, Advice Note Seven: Environmental Impact Assessment: Process, Preliminary Environmental Information and Environmental Statements, Advice Note Eight: Overview of the nationally significant infrastructure planning process for members of the public and others, Advice Note 8.3 Influencing how an application is Examined: the Preliminary Meeting, Advice Note Ten: Habitats Regulations Assessment relevant to nationally significant infrastructure projects, Advice Note Eleven: Working with public bodies in the infrastructure planning process, Advice Note Eleven, Annex A Cyfoeth Naturiol Cymru / Natural Resources Wales, Advice Note Eleven, Annex B Marine Management Organisation, Advice Note Eleven, Annex C Natural England and the Planning Inspectorate, Advice Note Eleven, Annex D Environment Agency, Advice Note Eleven, Annex E: Working with public bodies in the infrastructure planning process Historic England, Advice Note Eleven, Annex F Nuclear Regulators, Advice Note Eleven, Annex G The Health and Safety Executive, Advice Note Eleven, Annex H Evidence Plans for Habitats Regulations Assessments of Nationally Significant Infrastructure Projects, Advice Note Twelve: Transboundary Impacts and Process, Advice note thirteen: Preparation of a draft order granting development consent and explanatory memorandum, Advice Note Fourteen: Compiling the Consultation Report, Advice Note Fifteen: Drafting Development Consent Orders, Advice Note Sixteen: Requests to change applications after they have been accepted for examination, Advice Note Seventeen: Cumulative effects assessment relevant to nationally significant infrastructure projects, Advice Note Eighteen: The Water Framework Directive, Updated to establish optimised change request process, Update to clarify pre-submission requirements and submission methods, Updated to include advice on video submissions, Updated sources of further information and general update for clarity and currency, The Advice Note has been updated to reflect changes in legislation, guidance and suggested ways of working, Annex 3 updated to reflect changes made to The Infrastructure Planning (Applications: Prescribed Forms and Procedures) Regulations 2009 following the coming into force of The Infrastructure Planning (Publication and Notification of Applications etc.) This advice note includes minor revisions made in response to emerging best practice on projects. 8.7 Applicants should consider carefully whether publication of the PEI at a more advanced stage in the design process of the NSIP, where more detailed information is known about the Proposed Development and its environmental effects, would generate more detailed responses and so better inform the design of the Proposed Development and their EIA. Please note, this advice note refers to, Advice Note Seven: Environmental Impact Assessment: Preliminary Environmental Information, Screening and Scoping Republished June 2020 (version 7). This advice note explains the roles of applicants, the appropriate agencies and the Secretary of State in meeting the requirements of The Water Environment (Water Framework Directive) (England and Wales) Regulations 2017, as applicable to Nationally Significant Infrastructure Projects under the Planning Act 2008. Google Analytics sets cookies that store anonymised information about: Please enable Strictly Necessary Cookies first so that we can save your preferences! Schedule 3 is only relevant to Schedule 2 projects). The advice note also introduces and explains the use of Water Framework Directive overview matrices [see Appendix 1] prepared by thePlanningInspectorate. This includes: 3.8 The Planning Inspectorate requests that notifications made in accordance with Regulation 8(1)(b) of the EIA Regulations are accompanied by information sufficient to facilitate Regulation 11. Formatting changes, hyperlink on page 1 updated, typo corrected in appendix 1, In order listed in previous column: 2, 3, 3, 4, 3, 3. Rights of way guidance booklet - GOV.UK The Advice Note also provides advice to Applicants to support them with the successful completion of the process applicable to NSIPs. Where the request document contains high resolution plans/figures, the Planning Inspectorate asks that a low resolution electronic copy is also provided to enable easier downloads for those viewing the document via the National Infrastructure Planning website. 01/2009 and all the good practice advice notes which were also published by pins. Advice Note Five: Section 53 Rights of entry RepublishedMarch 2017(version 6). This annex has been revised to reflect current practice. It also explains the involvement of the applicant in the process. 3 See the Planning Inspectorate's Advice Notes 8.1 and 8.2 on how the process works and This requirement is reflected in the DCO Application Form under Section 14(c) where the Applicant is asked to identify whether notification has been given to these bodies. Download March 2015 - Tidal Lagoon Cardiff EIA Scoping Report PDF for free. the pages you visit on this site, and how long you spend on each page, what you click on while you're visiting the site. 3.7 Applicants should be aware that if the Planning Inspectorate screens or re-screens the Proposed Development during acceptance and determines that it is EIA development, Applicants will be required to provide an ES (Regulation 5(2)(a) of the APFP Regulations 2009) and consideration of the DCO application will be suspended until an ES is provided by the Applicant (Regulation 15(4) of the EIA Regulations). 6 Regulation 11 notification. Advice Note Sixteen: Requests to change applications after they have been accepted for examination Published March 2023 (version 3). Planning Inspector training manual - WhatDoTheyKnow Advice Note Eighteen: The Water Framework Directive 5.4 The scoping process is undertaken by the Planning Inspectorate on behalf of the Secretary of State. (Further details of the suggested format for the transboundary screening matrix is provided in the Planning Inspectorates Advice Note 12 Transboundary Impact Consultation.) The screening opinion must include written reasons for the Planning Inspectorates decision on whether or not the Proposed Development is EIA development. Could the impact contribute cumulatively with other impacts to result in significant effects to the aspect/ matter? We use cookies to collect information about how you use National Infrastructure Planning site. Correction of Table 3, Tier 2 projects description, removing the word not so that the text reads projects on the Planning Inspectorates Programme of Projects where a scoping report has been submitted.". The information provided in the PEI should be accessible yet meet consultees different needs. Consideration should be given towards the level of certainty and confidence attached to the information in order to aid the Planning Inspectorates decision. Advice Note Eight has been produced in six sections and aims to take you step by step through the planning process for Nationally Significant Infrastructure Projects: Advice Note Nine: Rochdale Envelope RepublishedJuly 2018 (version 3). It is for the Applicant to satisfy themselves if a Proposed Development constitutes an NSIP in accordance with the PA2008. Planning Inspectorate Published 1 January 2010 Last updated . The purpose of this advice note is to provide advice on elements of the EIA process during the Pre-application stage, namely screening and scoping and to assist applicants in understanding the role of preliminary environmental information. March 2015 - Tidal Lagoon Cardiff EIA Scoping Report - FLIP HTML5 Consequently, all IPC advice notes have been republished by the Planning Inspectorate. It has no statutory status. It also reflects the views, on DCO drafting matters, of those government departments that are most involved in the consenting of DCOs. 7.1 The Planning Inspectorate requests that advance notice is given prior to making any screening/scoping request. Introduction. 8.2 PEI is defined in the EIA Regulations 2017 as: 8.3 information referred to in regulation 14(2) which . Advice Note Eight: Overview of the nationally significant infrastructure planning process for members of the public and othersPublished December 2016. This advice note sets out a staged approach to cumulative effects assessment (CEA) for Nationally Significant Infrastructure Projects and provides template formats for documenting the CEA within an applicants Environmental Statement. Start letter and initial work. 4.2 In accordance with Regulation 11(1)(b) of the EIA Regulations, the Planning Inspectorate will provide the Applicant with a list of the notified consultation bodies and any Regulation 11(1)(c) persons. Please note, this advice note refers to Appendix 1 and Appendix 2 as separate documents. 1.2 Regulation 5 of the EIA Regulations explains that EIA is a process consisting of: 1.3 Regulation 6 of the EIA Regulations explains that a development is EIA development if: 1.4 Regulation 8(1) of the EIA Regulations requires a person who proposes to make an application for an order granting development consent to carry out the EIA screening process described below before carrying out statutory consultation under s42 of the PA2008. In order to gain the most benefit, Applicants should consider requesting the opinion once there is sufficient certainty about the design of the Proposed Development and the main design elements likely to have a significant environmental effect. Planning appeals: procedural guide - GOV.UK 6.4 Any references made to relevant documents (eg a National Policy Statement, methodological guidance or other document which are to be relied on) should be made to the specific passage, policy or relevant part of the document. 9.3 The Planning Inspectorate considers that a good ES is one that: 9.4 Practical advice regarding ES production including presentation techniques is provided at Annex 1 and should be considered alongside this Advice Note. Appendix 1 - Preparing the technical index to accompany an NSIP application. Advice Note 2 - Working together on NSIPs (version 2 April 2012) was retired and replaced with a new Advice Note 2 - The role of local authorities in the development consent process (version 1 February 2015). Thank you for your email, requesting information from the Planning Inspectorate. 7.3 At the same time as advance notice is given, a GIS shapefile should be provided to the Planning Inspectorate to identify the land for which the screening and/or scoping request is made. Is there empirical evidence available to support the request? Advice Note Six: Preparation and submission of application documents (version 11), This advice note will assist applicants in preparing, organising and submitting applications to the Planning Inspectorate. 7.4 The technical specifications for the shapefile are: 7.5 The shapefile must match exactly the red line that will be presented within the scoping request. provides a clear description of the Proposed Development through all phases of the development consistent with the DCO ie in terms of construction, operation and decommissioning phases; clearly explains the processes followed to develop the ES including the established scope for the assessment; explains the reasonable alternatives considered and the reasons for the chosen option taking into account the effects of the Proposed Development on the environment; details the forecasting methods for the assessment and the limitations (as relevant); assesses in an open and robust way the assessment of likely significant effects explaining where results are uncertain; provides sufficient details of the measures envisaged to prevent, reduce and where possible offset any significant adverse effects, the likely efficacy of such measures and how they are secured; details the need for any ongoing monitoring or remediation; and. the pages you visit on this site, and how long you spend on each page, what you click on while you're visiting the site. Is there sufficient detail and certainty regarding the location and characteristics of the Proposed Development? 6.2 The electronic copy should be a single file including all appendices and figures. 5.11 The Planning Inspectorate considers that suitable justification to support the scoping out of aspects and matters should include information to address the following questions: 5.12 Inclusion of information responding to the points above will increase the likelihood of the Planning Inspectorate being able to agree to any scoping out requests. PDF Planning Act 2008: Guidance on the pre-application process - GOV.UK Planning Inspectorate Published 1 March 2014 . This advice note has been updated to take into account changes occurring as a result of the introduction of the Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017. an outline of the structure of the proposed ES. The Regulation specifies As far as the proposed development remains materially the same as the proposed development which was subject to that opinion). The Planning Inspectorate will treat the submitted Development Consent Order (DCO) application as a screening request and will re-screen the Proposed Development at the same time as undertaking the decision as to whether or not to accept the application (Regulation 15 of the EIA Regulations). Whilst this Advice Note is aimed primarily at Applicants, it should also be helpful for other persons involved in the PA2008 system. Advice note 10 has been substantially revised to provide practical guidance on how to submit Habitats Regulations Assessment information with an application and how the Planning Act 2008 process, as amended by the Localism Act 2011, will address HRA.